The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
are you kidding ?
in General
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
Sadly, some subjects attracts certain types of debaters and that is true of any debate forums, even in front of an audience, some people don't know what shame is... There will always be disingenuous debaters or trolls and there are some with actual cognitive dissonance problems... After a while you know who's who and you can either ignore or play...
But there are those who even when disagreeing can have serious debates in conviviality and good faith, and you end up recognizing them too after a while...
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: good faith    types of debaters   debate forums   subjects  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: excellent reply    site      
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
This site is geared toward casual debate. Debateart, or DART, is where the superintensive debaters are. All the debate.org peeps are there now.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 36%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: debate.org peeps    site   DART   casual debate  
  Relevant (Beta): 18%  
  Learn More About Debra
My reply .....You posted up a debate topic on racism stating it was inherent to humans , you made various statements to support your assertions but when questioned by me and others you offered not one defence of your position, why’s that?
You posted up a piece on prayer and make a rather strange statement about “positive brain energies” and could not explain what you were talking about instead you posted a link to a site that involved a mish mash of psuedoscientific nonsense , why can you not offer a defense for your assertions.
As soon as you’re questioned on any of your assertions you either flee or post a link up that explains nothing ,maybe you can resolve this situation you’re giving out about by actually debating?
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: mish mash    original post   defence of your position   various statements  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: strong scientific mind    quantum mechanics   science   influence  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say ...... because you do and would not understand
My reply .....How childish , what a cop out “you would not understand “ which means you actually cannot as I suspected defend any of your positions as now proven
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 79%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: understandMy reply    cop   positions   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .....it has been shown by science that quantum mechanics has an influence on actual reality,
My reply .....Quantum mechanics itself does not make reference to reality it makes predictions of measurement results
You say .......Can I prove it? no, but science has.
My reply .....It hasn’t ,
You say ......I can show you links to it but that would not be my opinion.
My reply .....If your last link is an indication of future links I think it best you don’t
You say ......yet a strong scientific mind like yours should be able to accept science on face-value. look it up!!
My reply .....I agree which is why I laughed out loud at your last link which is totally anti science , yet a weak pseudoscientific mind like yours finds it entirely plausible. Pseudoscience, look it up !!
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: quantum mechanics    last link   actual reality   indication of future links  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 67%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Stephen hawking    easy read   brief history of time   name  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .....again. look it up!
My reply ......I don’t do pseudoscience, I will leave that to you
You say ......it has much more to do than observing measurements.
My reply .......That what quantum mechanics do , I know that comes as a shock to you
You say ......name one book that you have read other than the bible and that is non-fiction.
My reply ......Wow! Getting questioned by a geek who gets all his opinions from You Tube
You say ......need a start.
My reply .....I suggest you heed your own advice as everything you post is someone else’s opinion
You say .....suggest Stephen hawking and a brief history of time.
My reply .....I bet you’ve never even read it
You say ......it is an easy read and even you may get some benefit from it
My reply .....I know and I did get it you certainly did not as your last link to a new age nature site clearly demonstrated
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: easy read    measurements.My reply   quantum mechanics   reply  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 71%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: counts    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: early Hebrew    time-gap   block form   biblical expert  
  Relevant (Beta): 47%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say ..... are wrong on all counts
My reply .....Superb defence and so typically you , as in “I’m right you’re wrong nah , nah , na nan , na , ne
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 43%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 55%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: .....     wrong nah   Superb defence   na nan  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 1.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: reply    rest      
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I'm sorry that your experience has been what you have expressed thus far.
I have come to the impression, that the internet is where some, and their various mindsets, ideologies, one sided opinions, and or rhetoric pushing like to play with the public, via their distorting views?
Hopefully it's not that way with all websites, but given my experience with a few thus far, it has been that way.
Reason being, one can create an anonymous name, and act, and carry on in a way that suits them, because its the internet?
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: various mindsets    distorting views   way.Reason being   anonymous name  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say ..... ; I believe you are only on this site as to attract attention to what must be an boring existence.
My reply .....Thank you Dr Freud for your analysis, reading your tripe would put an insomniac into a coma you’re a champion when it come to boring
You say .....I see nothing on here where you try to educate others with ideas;
My reply ......I did try but in your case one cannot educate pork , you had not one answer to several questions I posted on your ridiculous copy and pasted “argument “ on racism
You say .....you simply say they are wrong and insult them.
My reply .....If you and other religious nuts fire off insults you get them back
You say ......you claim you are an expert on the bible,
My reply ......I am
You say ......in which I doubt,
My reply .....The opinion of a buffoon bears no relevance on my obvious expertise
You say ......however anyone can point out the mistakes in it as it is written today.
My reply ..... Anyone? Christians think it perfect so tell me do the billions of Christians agree with your “assessment “?
You say ..... The bible was originally written(most of it) in early Hebrew which was written in block form, with the letters written and read from right to left. with no capitals, no vowels and no spaces between the words or any paragraphs. I suppose you will claim I am wrong on that as well.
My reply ......And your point is exactly?
You say ......Before eve, there was a book left out of the bible about lillith who did not accept adams superiority and became a demoness. ever hear of Gilgamesh?
My reply .....And your point?
You say ......am sure such an biblical expert of yourself would know all of this without looking it up.
My reply .....You just posted a piece that’s a rambling bit of nonsense with no relevance to anything
You say ......it is a shame there is such a time-gap between our answers for I doubt you could answer questions such as these in rapid-fire
My reply .....Yet another ridiculous assertion from a geek who thinks “cutting edge “ science is found in a new-age nature site , you have the intelligence of a pot plant and that’s being generous
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.46  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: .....     reply   ridiculous copy   rapid-fireMy reply  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 44%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: site    individuals      
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 19%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 60%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 0.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: nbsp         
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say ....You bore me
My reply......I was going to insult you but I see genetics has beaten me to the punch by taking it out on your face
  Considerate: 24%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: reply    genetics   face   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 26%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: new age christians    dumb r   copy   paste  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say ..... truly spoken. I have yet to find a site that does not have on it individuals who use a site for simply ranting
My reply ......Where would you normally do your ranting , I also see you have made friends with one of the site nuts you guys should get a room
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: site    reply   individuals   friends  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 59%  
  Substantial: 55%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: dont    friends   trolls   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .....
My reply .....That’s your definition of friends oh dear. But all you do is troll buddy
You say .....why dont you simply debate normally like others on here?
My reply ..... But I do , you are the one insists on posting a debate topic asserting a view and not defend it , don’t believe me?
Look at my reply to your racism debate
You say ......you are the only one I have seen who acts like this
My reply .....I debate fairly with others who give respect you don’t as you’re a troll when you learn to behave I mar re- engage
  Considerate: 39%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: debate topic    racism debate   troll buddy   reply  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: way    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say .....Fine by me. I’m not following you around. As far as I’m concerned you can go merrily upon your way.
My reply ......Indeed , I suppose that is your best way of avoiding defending the various points you made on your racism debate as you realize you’ve no defence .....you’re dismissed
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: various points    racism debate   best way   reply  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Americanism not Globalism, will be our credo." ~Donald Trump
"A communist is like a crocodile" ~Winston Churchill
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 39%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: controversial topic    people   very debate   insult people  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 55%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: insults    dee      
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Thats inaccurate and unfair I asked you to clarify your position regards several positions you held and you reply was ..... because you do and would not understand.....
Thats terribly immature and childish yet you rage about others behavior .....strange
  Considerate: 43%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: .....     position   reply   positions  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: transcript    time      
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Incorrect I never resort to insult until another throws the first jab , from my first encounter with you for some reason you took exception to being questioned you resorted to insult and you got it back .
I see Ethang who’s the most abusive on here gives out also about Atheists insulting him all because he flies into a rage when questioned, I care not he like you can insult away at least you’re not a rabid racist like Ethang
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: first jab    first encounter   reason   exception  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
@maxx I have seen your debate with @Dee under the "justice" post. When he asked you questions you refused to answer them and said things like "you would not understand"... I think you made this post because you are angry at people for not straight out agreeing with you.
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: merits of a different religion    atheist   time    
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: first post    people   prayer   posts  
  Relevant (Beta): 30%  
  Learn More About Debra
Thank you for that Alex and the respect is mutual , I always enjoy your points of view and even if we don’t agree your reasoning is always excellent. I love to exchange views that’s what we are here for and I will engage with anyone , if someone throws a jab they get two back that’s the way I am but would much prefer if it didn't happen. Maybe I should just disengage in future but it’s the fighting Irish in me
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: points of view    Alex   respect   jab  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
The point you’re making is unclear could you clarify?
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: point    making      
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 52%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: first post    site   point   regime of insults  
  Relevant (Beta): 37%  
  Learn More About Debra
At the start, the electrons are in a superposition of several "states". They exist at more than one place. Then we send them other particles to observe them and this interaction forces them to decide on a single "state". This is called a wave function collapse.
In fact, the double slit experiment would still work even if nobody individually looked at the electrons. The important thing here is interaction.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 72%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: simple debate    insulting others   debate site   post  
  Relevant (Beta): 40%  
  Learn More About Debra
"you saying I am insulting others"
I said that this post was an insult to great debaters on this site. I was not meaning "insult" in a literal way.
"was pointing out that she was all over me on that post"
Not really... you started to make no sense there. She said that your idea was silly and said that you were talking nonsense. And I will have to agree with her on that one.
"And what makes you think I posted justice because I am angry?"
I never said that you posted justice because you are angry. I said that you made THIS post because people would not agree with you.
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
Again this is simply not true you said at the very start your arrogance is telling , I don’t “misconstrue “ the idea of debate, do you not think this type of remark is unwarranted? At this stage you just want to say you’re right yet again all because you say so
.....either you are missing my point or misconstruing the idea of a debate. Are you agreeing with my post? The idea of a debate is to argue the opposing side. I said IF a prayer works then it would “ not” be the prayer doing it but instead the positive belief from our minds. I could attempt to explain this from the point of quantum mechanics on how individuals create their own reality through their thinking
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: idea of debate    point of quantum mechanics   stage   idea of a debate  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
Thats exactly what I accused him of before as in using Deepak Chopra style gobbledygook nonsense. Incidentally Alex I’m male for some reason Ethang and Maxx Assume I’m female
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 56%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Deepak Chopra style gobbledygook nonsense    reason Ethang   Alex   Maxx Assume  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
Oh sorry, so I was right the first time.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 33%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 42%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: posts    guys   attempts   insults  
  Relevant (Beta): 40%  
  Learn More About Debra
"his is about the dumbest on-line debate site ever; rathe the majority of the people on here simply do not know the rules of a debate and use the site as a sounding board to rant and rave( like I am doing now). most of their posts make little sense and their answers go so far afield from the original debate that the original post is lost."
It is not that I think this is an insult. This is, by definition, an insult to the productive people in this community.
" If you don’t like my posts or think that they are attempts at insults to the site then simply do not answer them"
This is the point of this site though. If we believe someone is wrong on something, we write about it. Do you expect to get responses only from those who agree with you?
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: first post    ease   level   insults  
  Relevant (Beta): 74%  
  Learn More About Debra
" in which my first post got me nothing but insults from others"
... Maybe you deserved them? Do you ever consider the possibility that you were wrong to use quantum mechanics in a wrong way? And then claim that you have a deep understanding of the subject? Even if you did not use insult words at the start, you were very bossy and arrogant on that debate...
"why do you not post, I see you are at level one and have none."
I am at level 4 and I have 14 debates. I know that is not a lot because I like to write arguments more than I like to start debates. I like to read arguments as well. Also, I have other hobbies besides this. I like debates but it is not really my main hobby.
"you seem at ease at circular reasoning"
It seems that you make a lot of accusations without the ability of actually supporting them. My arguments were not circular in any way, you were just unable to understand them. I have repeated that my position was not that "justice exists" a thousand times in that other debate but you responed with: "Show me justice". This clearly shows that you are unable to listen to the other side and all you care about is to be able to object to "unscientific" (in your eyes) people and get easy wins.
"I would expect profound ideas from one who stands in defense of this site and its great debaters."
Relevance? I said that I respect some of the debaters here for their ability to make arguments and see the other side's point. Do you believe that I need to have profound ideas to respect someone?
Your real face is starting to show... People like you always put this "I am an objective person who is open to ideas." front but when you actually debate them for a while, they finally crack and start insulting everyone. You remind me of a certain flat earther I have debated here once...
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: mico world ideas    animal kingdom   circular reasoning   lot of accusations  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
When someone has this much of a problem understanding your arguments, you naturally give them an easier way of understanding that argument. Which was that link of the Feynman video. And you refused to click it by saying "we are debating by links now?!" although you did not have any problem with the earlier link that I have sent you...
You do not understand my argument. And you cannot even admit this. You cannot back to: "oh you are unable to explain it!" now, because you already acted like you understood my arguments and called them "invalid theories". Let's see, are you capable of admitting this simple mistake?
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 68%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: works of quantum mechanics    mix mash of his words   dubious sites   bell  
  Relevant (Beta): 71%  
  Learn More About Debra
"ive read enough of bell and feynman and planck and the works of quantum mechanics"
My argument has nothing to do with those (except feynman but the video I had sent you was not a scientific work, therefore I doubt you read about it before watching that video). Understand this: My idea has nothing to do with quantum. So stop bringing that up in your every comment.
" your video is out of context with what he actually states"
How is it different? He says that limiting yourself to a specific part of the hierarcy and trying to find the ultimate understanding (or god, metaphorically) there is a mistake. This was what I was trying to explain to you.
"how old are you anyway, mid 20s or something? I ask this because most under 35 get their information from dubious sites such as you tube"
It was a clip of Richard Feynman explaining something. It requires no prior knowledge and does not make any scientific claims. It just explains an idea. If you see a mathematical proof on youtube, is it invalid because it is on youtube? No. This is the same case. Feynman explains a certain idea there. Not to mention that the clip is from one of his actual lectures so the clip being on youtube has nothing to do with anything. Some of his lectures have actually been uploaded to youtube. Catch up with the new times, old man!
You are saying something, I disprove it and then you move onto something else and act like it never happened. Oh boy, I am sure enjoying this "debate" that we are having.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 39%  
  Learn More About Debra